<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Okay, Now I Can Reconcile Myself With The Doctrine of Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://merereflections.org/2010/01/31/election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://merereflections.org/2010/01/31/election/</link>
	<description>of the glory revealed</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 03:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riley</title>
		<link>http://merereflections.org/2010/01/31/election/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://merereflections.org/?p=222#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Good post. The tension is here... to quote a little unrelated Jon Foreman. :) 

Election is best viewed when it&#039;s not done from a specific point in time, i.e. beginning of time (picking out people) or end of time (after the fact). That&#039;s why God doesn&#039;t really work conceptually well in the Time box.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. The tension is here&#8230; to quote a little unrelated Jon Foreman. <img src='http://merereflections.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Election is best viewed when it&#8217;s not done from a specific point in time, i.e. beginning of time (picking out people) or end of time (after the fact). That&#8217;s why God doesn&#8217;t really work conceptually well in the Time box.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zach</title>
		<link>http://merereflections.org/2010/01/31/election/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 04:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://merereflections.org/?p=222#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Haha, thanks man.

I&#039;m glad you appreciate it. I wasn&#039;t sure if I was making sense. I reread it and was like, this makes sense to me, but I don&#039;t know if it will to anyone else...haha.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, thanks man.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you appreciate it. I wasn&#8217;t sure if I was making sense. I reread it and was like, this makes sense to me, but I don&#8217;t know if it will to anyone else&#8230;haha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: III</title>
		<link>http://merereflections.org/2010/01/31/election/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>III</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 03:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://merereflections.org/?p=222#comment-205</guid>
		<description>First of all, congrats on winning the &quot;most categories in one post&quot; award.  I believe that&#039;s what tagging was invented for, but whatever.

Second of all, this was a good post.  And once again, we find a healthy tension.  As always.

Third, and lastly: a job well done on quoting Shane Clairborne and John Piper in the same post, and where they&#039;re agreeing (or at least not disagreeing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, congrats on winning the &#8220;most categories in one post&#8221; award.  I believe that&#8217;s what tagging was invented for, but whatever.</p>
<p>Second of all, this was a good post.  And once again, we find a healthy tension.  As always.</p>
<p>Third, and lastly: a job well done on quoting Shane Clairborne and John Piper in the same post, and where they&#8217;re agreeing (or at least not disagreeing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

