Category Archives: Debunking

The Constitution is Not God-Breathed

Disclaimer: This was difficult for me to write, so I apologize if it isn’t as coherent as I hope for it to be. This is exclusively written to Christians, and is meant to point out inconsistencies I have observed that are most likely implied rather than purposeful effects of over-zealous patriotism in the life of a Christian. Also, I apologize for my over-use of italics… :)

Around July 4th of this year, I asked Trey what he thought I should write about next on here, and the answer he gave me was “Patriotism.” So here we go: I think that Patriotism is not a bad thing to have. The problem is, when a Christian’s Patriotism and Love of Christ are indistinguishable in the passion we give them, it misrepresents what Christ is about and belittles the authority of the Bible. I’m not trying to bash Patriotism in and of itself, because there is something to be said for a country having unity among it’s people, but there’s just a problem when Christians don’t acknowledge the fact that they are united to a body that is greater than any physical boundaries. As the great theologian Jon Foreman once said (and yes, Trey, I did just mess with your trademark phrase),

I pledge allegiance to a country without borders, without politicians.

1. Americans are not God’s chosen people.
The idea that we have a divine right or anything like that is false. God having a ‘chosen people’ ended when Christ died:

“…for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through Faith. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male or female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s offspring, heirs according to the promise.” (Galatians 3:26-29)

Okay, so maybe I lied. God does still have a chosen people, but their ‘chosen-ness’ has nothing to do with who they are or where they live! They are defined simply by the infinite love that they have received from God. They are Christ’s bride and he does not care what they look like. So it does a terrible disservice when “Christian” and “American” are equated. When a Christian identifies themselves as an American with equal or more fervor than they identify themselves with Christ, it looks like America is the land of God and that you must be American to be Christian and that, of course, is not true.

2. Extreme patriotism misrepresents Christ and the purpose of the Church.
Equating American values and Chistianity is dangerous, because Jesus was decidedly counter-cultural. Doing so equates America’s self-centeredness, consumerism, complacency etc. with Jesus’ love, kindness, forgiveness, and tendency to tell people that they needed to repent of their ways. (And that last one refers to Christians more than non-Christians.) Christ did not vie for political power, though I’m sure he could have.* He instead went to the poor and the outcasts himself and loved them. The Church has enough problems as it is**, without being tangled up in the scandals and problems of the American government and political parties. The only scandal the Church needs to be involved in is the scandal of the gospel.

3. The Constitution does not have the same authority as the Bible.
As the title of this post says, the Constitution is not God-breathed. It has as much divine inspiration as any other country’s main document of laws.
There is a definite distinction between what the Constitution says and what the Bible stands for, and when Christians are as enthusiastic about the Constitution as they are about the Bible, it belittles the Bible.

In closing, patriotism is not important; your allegiance to Christ is important.

If you must define yourself with devotion to something, let it be Christ. I promise it will be infinitely more fulfilling. Christ will not fail you.

______________________________________

*Whether this was because he thought political power was not important or that he was trying to stay out of the spotlight until he was supposed to be crucified, or both, I do not know. But, I assume that he wanted to represent himself, and not get involved in a group that would misrepresent him. And that’s not to say he was never involved in a group like that, since, of course, the church misrepresents him all the time, but that’s kind of a different story.

**I’m not saying that that means that Christians shouldn’t be involved in the church. But hopefully that is obvious! Christians are commanded to be involved in the Church, we are the church, the body of Christ. We are not the body of Uncle Sam or something ridiculous like that.

My Thoughts on the Qur’an Burning

So, yeah, everyone knows what I’m talking about I presume. If you don’t, just Google it. There’s enough people talking about it that I thought it was worth formulating a formal opinion on.

I want to make two preliminary things very clear.

  1. I do not agree with Jones’ decision to burn the Qur’an.
  2. I am in no way a softie to the Muslim faith.

Just so we have those two things out of the way. They are both important in understanding my view, and seem to be two polarizing points in the modern argument. I stand not on either polar end.

Okay, that being said, let me say some things I want to say. I believe Islam is evil, just as I believe any false faith or god is evil. I would define evil as being “something that leads one to neglect the ultimate reality, authority, and glory of God,” so therefore I think that it is evil. I don’t feel like I have to justify saying that, or defend myself on that point. If you believe the Bible to the letter, then you understand how a faith that leads people to not turn to the true Yaweh is not a good faith, and leads people to believe something else is the ultimate ends of life and squander their life in pursuit of it, just as someone in America might squander their life in pursuit of money, fame, the American Dream, etc. But while money and power are not at their root in opposition to God, but rather the love of them is (1 Timothy 6:10), you can see how religions/faiths that lead people not to look at Jesus as the Righteous One, the Son of God, and the only way to belief in the One True God, cannot be good. In fact they are the opposite of good. I would call this evil.

I don’t hate people who are Muslims, just as I wouldn’t hate a lost person who is a severe alcoholic, or an adulterer, or a homosexual, or a glutton. All of these sins that lead one to turn form the One True God through Jesus Christ are all results of a fallen and twisted world, from which all Christians were saved from. We WERE ‘grouped,’ if you will, with these. Notice the past tense of were, but it does exist. Those of the Muslim faith are not aliens, they’re not themselves forces of Satan, and most importantly nor are they somehow too far from the grace of God in redemption through Christ. For those that are quick to strike hatred against those who do wrong that have not yet been redeemed by God, you need a good dose of the Gospel, and you might want to ask yourself if you have been saved at all. Just saying.. it’s a question worth asking. If you are, then lower your pride, get your face and heart in the word, and get on your knees. Our hearts should break for these people, and fill with just (as in justice) anger toward iniquity. Their sin is in no way excused, but perhaps in our brokenness we can see their sin condition as being so similar to ours before Christ, and pray that the just, righteous, glorious God would show mercy on them and draw them, through the Holy Spirit, to redemption in Christ. That should be the main thing on our minds… not hatred…and not soft, relativistic, inclusive cushiness that is the other polar opposite.

So yes, love the sinner. But love them not for the fact that their belief is somehow honorable and respectable, but because you see in them a brokenness which is hell-bound without beautiful redemption through Christ. Pray that for them, and pray it hard. Real hard. There is a danger that we will fall into a defensive anger in defense of those of the Muslim faith that borders on religious inclusivism. Inclusivism says you can believe what you want to believe and if you really believe it and love it and are morally good, it can’t be all that bad. Guys, the Muslim does not know God. The Muslim has been deceived. The Muslim is hell-bound without redemption through Christ. We have to understand that. The Muslim, just as one under any other faith that doesn’t celebrate and worship and glory in the lordship and deity and atonement of Jesus, has been deceived by evil. And that should make us angry with a righteous anger toward sin and toward the evil one and his agents. If it doesn’t, then we need to get in the word and on our knees in prayer and pray God would remind us of the exclusive lordship of Jesus Christ (John 14:6).

So how does this relate to the Qur’an? Why don’t I want it to be burned? I mean it’s evil, so how can an outspoken act against the evil be bad? Or…. on the other hand, why don’t I celebrate the Qur’an in defiance of the burning? Why don’t I come to the strong side of the Muslims and defend them fully because they should have a voice just like everyone else?

Actually, I don’t want the Qur’an to be burned because I think it’s stupid. It’s just asking for it. Images of the burning will, as news articles have said, no doubt be bused by Muslim extremists to incite hatred against America that will result in more violence and danger. Violence=no good. So I’m against the Qur’an burning because, practically, it won’t work. Those that think the book is holy text will just get royally ticked off (as well as a whole lot of other people), and those that believe that it’s false won’t be helped because they already believe it’s false. So sure, it’s making a statement, but it’s just stupid. That being said, I still think Christian churches should preach the exclusive claim of the Christian faith and Christ’s exclusive authority and sacrifice as the way to redemption to the true God. Some Christian churches are going to have “inclusive services” where they read the Qur’an to somehow counter what the Florida preacher is doing. (read http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/top/all/7190534.html) That’s just a load of BS. Seriously. Yes, love the Muslim with a brokenness for the condition of their soul, which is so similar to yours before Christ! But don’t compromise the very essence of what brings God glory! Don’t compromise worship of the True God and of his Son! Come on. Christianity is an exclusive religion, as is Islam. So in a way, I think Islam should be preached against. But blatantly creating signals that are obviously violent is no good. It helps no one, and it ends up hurting everyone. That’s the long and the short of it. Rather, it’s just the long. But I want to make myself descriptively clear.

Wrap-up: Get broken, love the lost, hate what God hates, pray for redemption, don’t be stupid, preach Jesus, deny all other claims, glorify God. Repeat.

Make sense?

-Riley

“What If Jesus Meant All That Stuff”–A Rebuttal

Shane Claiborne does indeed have some good things to say (and while I’ll base the rebuttal mainly on the article Zach posted, I want it to be known that I have read his book Irresistible Revolution, so I think I’m allowed to give an opinion on what he has to say without being accused of “not understanding”, or “taking him out of context”). For instance: it’s true that true Christians are sometimes hypocritical and overly judgmental, and even more true that many who call themselves Christians, and even many of those who regularly attend church, display hate and sin and ridiculousness that the world mocks and that God hates. And more significantly (because everyone can see that first point), he points out that there is more to the Gospel than a get-out-of-hell-free-card/ticket-to-heaven. That is a crucial thing to realized, because such a mindset seems to be the prevalent view in both the world and the church as to what Gospel is all about. However, his alternative/response to this false gospel–that “God is love”–is equally misleading and dangerous. I fear that in his eagerness to counter the idea of a vengeful, angry God, he runs the risk of falling into a social gospel (which is not Gospel at all), and perhaps even worse a universalist view of God which demeans His holiness and justice and de-emphasizes the sinfulness and depravity of man, thus taking away from the power and scandal and beauty of the Cross. Because the fundamental point of the Gospel, and the reason why it is such great news, is that we are broken, wicked, and justly damned creatures with no hope of communion with God (which is the only true good we can have), but that through the bloody death of the Son of God, our sin is atoned for and our relationship with the Holy God is restored, so that we can experience Eternal Life (which is to know Him). This is why any Gospel which is not centered on the cross is a false gospel, or at least an incomplete gospel. Whether it falls on the side of hellfire and brimstone or love and unity doesn’t matter–if the focus is not the blood of Christ, we’re missing the whole point.

So here is my rebuttal, in the form of an article titled “What If Jesus Meant All That Stuff”. Rather, this is my edited version of Shane’s article.

To all my non-believing, sort-of-believing, and used-to-be-believing friends: I feel like I should begin with a confession. I am sorry that so often the biggest obstacle to God has been Christians. Christians who have done so much trying to preach the Gospel without words that we have forgotten to ever tell anyone what the Gospel is all about, and have forgotten the Cross of Christ, and the Life and Salvation that He bought for us with His blood.

Forgive us. Forgive us for leading you on to think that being a Christian is about being a good person and not doing bad stuff.

All over Christian television and radio and bookstores, you find people preaching that message. And if you talk to the average American church-goer, you’d probably find a similar perspective. It comes in many different forms, ranging from fundamentalism to mainstream megachurch-ism to hip Christian/New Age combinations, but the message is basically the same. “If you do this, good things will happen for you in this life and in the life to come. If you don’t do bad things, bad things won’t happen to you in this life or the life to come. Here are some simple, easy ways that you can make your life better.”

And while a large portion of America seems to be buying into it, most people can see right through it. They realize that there is no real power there–that that feel-good religion cannot really bring life, or explain the suffering and pain that happens despite all the promises of happiness as a reward for a good life. And so some reject it with bitterness, and spend their lives mocking and insulting Christianity as a whole. Others simply say “well, we can’t ever really know for sure”, and just give up on ever finding truth. Others just laugh and poke fun at everyone who is ‘so weak that they need religion to make themselves feel good about themselves.’ Personally, it breaks my heart that people confuse this watered down and adapted form of New Age spirituality for the Gospel, and occasionally I just want to stand up in the classrooms of my school and the street corners of my city and cry out: “No, that’s not what it’s all about! God is not Santa-Claus!”. Maybe one day I will. But as for now, I just have to take every opportunity that I can create to preach the true Gospel to the people I interact with on a daily basis.

Because more I have read the Bible and studied the life of Jesus and the teaching of the apostles, the more I have become convinced that Christianity spreads best not through an “unspoken witness” but through bold and unashamed declaration of the beauty and scandal of the Gospel. But over the past few decades our Christianity, at least here in the United States, has become less and less Cross-centered. We have given the atheists less and less to disbelieve. And the gospel many of us have seen on TV and heard on the radio looks less and less like life-giving “good news” and more and more like an banal, lifeless religion that offers only good feelings and inspirational speeches.

Comedian/filmmaker Penn Jillette once said “How much do you have to hate someone to NOT proselytize? How much do you have to hate someone to believe that everlasting life is possible, and not tell them that? I mean, if I believed, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that a truck was coming at you, and you didn’t believe it, and that truck was bearing down on you, there’s a certain point where I tackle you.” But it would seem that most Christians today are too meek to “tackle” people with the hard truths of the Gospel–that man is sinful and thus rightly damned by a just and holy God–and too shy to declare to people that a rescue is possible–that Eternal Life exists, and is possible for us to attain by the blood of Christ. We have been content to listen to the demands of the ignorant, blind man about to be hit by a truck that we leave him alone and keep our ridiculous beliefs to ourselves, and thus have brought on ourselves a crisis of message–we don’t even know any more what Christianity is all about. And it’s ugly stuff, because to some degree the blood of the man that gets run over because we wanted to avoid the social awkwardness is on our hands. And that’s why I begin by saying that I’m sorry.

Now for the good news.

I want to invite you to consider that maybe the televangelists and your “privately Christian” friends are wrong — and that the Gospel really is a matter of life and death. That being a Christian is about being saved from God’s wrath and then given a new heart so that you can love and exult in things that are good for you–namely fellowship with God–instead of ruining your life in pursuit of the fleeting and empty pleasures of sin, and not just about being nice to people and staying away from the taboo fun stuff so that one day when you die you can get a robe and a harp and wings. (If there is anything I have learned from prosperity-gospel preachers and PC-police, it’s that you can seem like you’re really nice to people and preach a very pleasant-sounding message, and yet not be doing what is best for them in the long run… and that true (agape) love a lot of times has to hurt.)

The Bible that I read says that Jesus did not come into the world to bring not peace but division… to separate the light from darkness and reveal the salvation that He brought for all men. The Bible I read says that the Cross is offensive to both religious people and heathens, because to the former it is an affront to self-righteousness and to the latter it seems like sheer folly, but to those who are saved by it, the Cross is the most glorious and powerful and scandalous and beautiful thing. That is the Gospel I know, and I long for others to know. I did not choose to devote my life to Jesus because I wanted an enhanced life, or a pick-me-up, or some kind of vague spiritual “comfort”… but because He is the only hope I have for salvation from myself. For those of you who want to believe the Bible but stumble over the seeming emptiness and just-like-every-other-religion-ness of American Christianity, I hope that you do not reject Christ because you misunderstand who Jesus really is and what He really accomplished for you. At the core of our Gospel is the message that Jesus came “not [for] the healthy… but the sick”–that you must realize your dire need before your can embrace your Savior. So if you choose Jesus, may it not be simply because of a fear of hell or hope for mansions in heaven, and may it not be simply to make yourself feel better or be more successful, but rather because you understand that you need Him.

Don’t get me wrong, I still believe that Jesus does save from Hell and get you into Heaven and give you true joy, but too often all churches have done is promise the world small rewards for “converting”, and have neglected to tell people the real good news–that you can know God!. I am convinced that the Gospel has as much to do with this life as the next, and that the message of that Gospel is not just about going up when we die but that God came down to us. And Jesus never promised a better life to believers: in fact, he promised trials and self-sacrifice and even persecution. So it’s not about a better life now, it’s about Eternal Life now.

One of Jesus’ most scandalous stories is the story of the Good Samaritan. As sentimental as we may have made it, the original story was about a man who gets beat up and left on the side of the road. A priest passes by. A scribe, the quintessential religious guy, also passes by on the other side (perhaps late for a meeting at church). And then comes the Samaritan… you can almost imagine a snicker in the Jewish crowd. Jews did not talk to Samaritans, or even walk through Samaria. But the Samaritan stops and takes care of the guy in the ditch and is lifted up as the hero of the story. I’m sure some of the listeners were ticked. According to the religious elite, Samaritans did not keep the right rules, and they did not have sound doctrine… but Jesus shows that true faith has to work itself out in a way that is Good News to the most bruised and broken person lying in the ditch. But contrary to popular opinion, this parable is not just about being a good person–it is a Messianic prophecy by the Messiah himself about what He did for us. We are the bruised and broken and dying person lying in a ditch. The priest and the scribe represent the world’s approach to how we can be saved–through man’s efforts to get to God by being generally good and not doing bad stuff. And Jesus turns everything upside down. He is despised and/or hated by the religious and secular folks alike (just as Samaritans were hated by both Jews and Gentiles), including the bruised and broken and dying man in the ditch (who was a Jew as well), and yet out of His goodness and love He came and rescued us.

Shane Claiborne has a friend in the UK who talks about “dirty theology” — that we have a God who is always using dirt to bring life and healing and redemption, a God who shows up in the most unlikely and scandalous ways. After all, the whole story begins with God reaching down from heaven, picking up some dirt, and breathing life into it. At one point, Jesus takes some mud, spits in it, and wipes it on a blind man’s eyes to heal him.

In fact, the entire story of Jesus is about a God who did not just stay “out there” but who moves into the neighborhood, a neighborhood where folks said, “Nothing good could come.” It is this Jesus who was accused of being a glutton and drunkard and rabble-rouser for hanging out with all of society’s rejects, and who died on the imperial cross of Rome reserved for bandits and failed messiahs. The religious folks and the heathens alike didn’t like Jesus’ claims that He was the only Way to the Father, both because they thought that they could get to God just fine on their own. But the first step to salvation is to give up and simply pray, as Martin Luther learned to: “Save me: I am Yours”.

It is this Jesus who was born in a stank manger in the middle of a genocide. That is the God that we are just as likely to find in the streets as in the sanctuary, who can redeem revolutionaries and tax collectors, the oppressed and the oppressors… a God who is saving some of us from the ghettos of poverty, and some of us from the ghettos of wealth.

In closing, to those who have closed the door on religion — I was recently asked by a non-Christian friend how I could have the right to tell someone who doesn’t believe in the Bible and lives in downright rebellion that they weren’t a Christian, if they claimed to be. And I responded with something like this: “It would seem like the ‘loving’ and ‘nice’ thing to do to let people believe what they like, and not discount their religious beliefs. But it would in reality be something much more like hate, because to leave them alone is to let them just go to hell because I don’t love them enough to tell them the hard truths.” True love picks up the dying man out the ditch even as he curses me for causing him discomfort. True love applies the salve and oil to clean his wounds even as he screams for me to stop. True love takes the man to a place where he can be cared for even as he spits in my face. And the True Lover did that for me. And He did it for You. I pray that if you reject Christ you will stop and consider the true meaning of the Gospel. Accept the bad news that you are in dire straits, and then run to the One who provided the escape, and let Him breath Eternal Life into your soul.

Your brother,
Trey

DEBUNKED!

Sorry, Riley, but I have to.

I pray and worship God like a Calvinist, but preach and proselytize like an Calvinist. Just not a hyper-Calvinist.

Contrary to popular opinion, Calvinism does not teach that we should sit on our rear ends and wait for God to do something. A sound view of the sovereignty of God in election rather teaches that we should work even harder and more faithfully than even those who hold a free-will view, because it’s not too late, it’s never too late for God to do a crazy work on someone’s hard heart. Even if they show zero signs of softening, or listening to what we’re saying/doing, we cannot give up because we do not know whom God has called, and we do not know if God intends to use our work to draw a person to Himself. So we must treat everyone as if they were elected, and we were the only conduit of the Spirit’s electing work in their life. Just saying…